Regents Commission on Library Services
January 26, 2000
METRO, Metropolitan New York Library Council
Attendance January 26
Co-chairs: Abby S. Milstein, Frank J. Macchiarola
Co-Vice chairs: Martín Gómez, Paul W. Crumlish
Members: Sandra Kennedy Bright, John Hammond, William Jefferson, Sara Kelly Johns, Gerald Nichols, Harry M. Rosenfeld, Sarah E. Thomas
Ex officio member: Janet M. Welch
Staff: Jean Hargrave, Carol Linn
Observers: Carol Desch, James Farrell, Janet Goltz, Wendy Galgan, Dottie Hiebing, Anne Hofmann, Susan Keitel (NYLA liaison), Liz Lane, Barbara Lilley, Fran Roscello, Gary Strong, Pat Webster, Lois Weinstein
Greetings
Ms. Milstein opened the January 26 meeting at 9:30 at the Metropolitan New York Library Council (METRO). She thanked Dottie Hiebing, METRO Director, for hosting the meeting.
Update if Regents Initiatives and the Executive Budget Proposal
Ms. Welch provided an update on Regents legislative initiatives. The Regents are seeking support for the $22.95
million proposal for the creation of NOVEL, public library construction, expanded library services to New Yorkers
with disabilities and inflationary increases for library materials at the State Library.
Ms. Welch also discussed the Executive budget proposal to remove the State Library, Archives and Museum from the control of the State Education Department. This proposal would create an Office of Cultural Resources budgeted under the Council for the Arts and headed by a separate nine-member board appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. No increases or decreases in staffing or funding are part of the proposal. The Executive budget proposal also included an inflationary increase for the State Library's acquisition budget. Mr. Macchiarola commented that the proposal does not address support for libraries. He advised that we shouldn't let this proposal distract us from the real issues surrounding libraries.
January 25 Meeting
Ms. Milstein reported that the Commission members and staff met for 4 hours the day before(January 25). Members and staff in attendance were Abby Milstein, Bill Crumlish, Martín Gómez, Sara Kelly Johns, Harry Rosenfeld, William Jefferson, Sandra Kennedy Bright, James C. Dawson, Janet Welch, Carol Linn and Jean Hargrave. Attending as observers were Pat Webster, Fran Roscello, Barbara Lilley, Jim Farrell, Liz Lane and Carol Desch. The group considered each recommendation in terms of substance, clarity and strength. The group also identified the following recommendations as those that would do the most to redefine the future of libraries in New York.
Commission members endorsed the idea of dividing the recommendations into two categories: transforming and enabling. Enabling recommendations are those that will be use to implement our vision for library service in the 21st century. These are the enabling recommendations:
State Library Role
The group agreed that strengthening the State library is key to implementing our vision. Without a major change in staffing and funding to increase the capacity of the State Library, the proposed policy recommendations can't be implemented.
Long-range Plan for Policy Change
Regent Dawson said that components of the report will be used to craft legislative and budget initiatives far beyond the current legislative session. There will probably not be another opportunity like this for another 10 or 20 years. We should think of the Commission report in terms of a long-range plan to improve library service in New York.
Increases in State Aid
The group discussed a need for a summary of increases in aid that are included in various recommendations. The summary should indicate whether the aid is an incentive, performance-based and/or need-based. We need to be explicit that there are different levels linked to different recommendations.
Achieving and Rewarding Excellence
The group discussed the idea of establishing a board to articulate and administer a program intended to achieve quality service and to recognize excellence.
Hearings
Ms. Milstein and Mr. Macchiarola led a discussion relating to the upcoming regional hearings. Ms. Milstein suggested that a description of the two sets of hearings be included in the appendix to the report. Mr. Macchiarola said he favors a format similar to the one used last year. The purpose of the hearings will be to hear reactions to the commission's preliminary policy recommendations, generate interest in the work of the commission and stimulate discussion that will assist us in developing the recommendations.
Ms. Bright said that it is useful to distribute print copies of testimony to Commissioners at the hearings. Speakers will be asked to provide print copies of their testimony as well as an electronic copy that can be posted on the Commission web site. In addition to other sources, public television stations might be used to publicize the hearings. Ms.Milstein and Mr.Macchiarola suggested that individual Commission members reach out to constituent groups prior to the hearings and ask them to participate in this process.
The schedule for the five regional hearings and a videoconference to discuss the draft report is as follows:
April 7: Hearing, Rochester Public Library, Rochester, Kate Gleason Auditorium, 10:00 - 4:00
April 13: Hearing, Brentwood Public library, 2nd Ave. & 4th Street, Brentwood, Long Island (April 13
Commission meeting canceled.)
April 25: Hearing, NYC, Fashion Institute of Technology, 227 West 27th Street, 10:00 - 4:00
April 26: Hearing, Albany Public Library, Main Branch, 161 Washington Ave., Albany, NY, 1:00 - 7:00
May 5: Hearing, Vestal Public Library, Binghamton, NY, 10:00 - 4:00
May 8: PictureTel videoconference, originating at the Cultural Education Center, Albany
Cultivating Constituent Groups
Mr. Gómez suggested that Commission members target stakeholders to inform them of the recommendations and ask for their support. Personal contact is needed to focus attention on our recommendations and gain support for them. The group reviewed a listing of stakeholders included in their packets and recommended additions to the list. The stakeholders will be encouraged to participate in up-coming hearings.
Next Steps
The meeting was adjourned at 2:30 P.M.
6/9/00