| New York State Library | Division of Library Development |
V. PLAN OF WORK
|
CHECKLIST …4 … Beginning date …4 … Hiring date and duration of work for new personnel …4 … Schedules for existing staff …4 … Consulting schedules …4 … Contractual work schedules …4 … Schedule for all other significant project activities |
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
V. PLAN OF WORK
Not applicable - Material covered in other categories. Entire restoration to be done by Regional Conservation Center.
COMMENTS:
A project without a plan of work is not a project at all--it is hard to imagine any circumstance in which the plan of work is not applicable.
Some section of the project description may not be applicable to certain types of projects, but before dismissing any section as "not applicable" you should be absolutely sure that there is no information on this topic that reviewers will need to evaluate your proposal.
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
V. PLAN OF WORK
A. The timetable for the project
The scrapbooks and folders will be assembled promptly for mailing. Where not already done, sheets of typing paper will be put between pages in each volume for protection. All envelopes containing materials will be shipped to the vendor. Time involved: 40 hours.
COMMENTS:
Reviewers will ask several questions: When will the work begin? ("Promptly" is not very specific.) When will the vendor begin work, and how long will it take? Has the vendor agreed to complete the work by a certain time? Before recommending a project for funding a reviewer will want to be assured that the institution can manage the project, coordinate all activities, and complete the project on time. It would appear from this response that only the most casual sort of scheduling has been done.
Although it is not relevant to the timetable, reviewers will also want to know (in the discussion of activities, methods, and techniques) what the purpose of the typing paper between the pages is. Interleaving with appropriate materials--buffered or, for photos, nonbuffered, neutral pH paper--is sometime advisable, but typing paper does not qualify as an appropriate material. Furthermore, it is doubtful that any sort of interleaving is necessary for scrapbooks headed for microfilming.
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
A. The timetable for the project
The plan is to have the entire collection re-evaluated and sorted out, recatalogued and reorganize the material with an open ended completion date-hope-fully it could be done by Spring of 1990. We plan to hire additional personnel in March 1989.
COMMENTS:
This is not reassuring. It seems that, if they receive a grant they plan to just wade into an unorganized collection and hope to get most of it done before the grant period is over. "Re-evaluating and sorting out" are not eligible activities for the Discretionary Grant Program. Combined with the lack of a clear plan reviewers will judge the project ineligible and go no further.
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
A. The timetable for the project
The timetable for the preliminary work is one year for the basic work to be accomplished. Thereafter the project will be on a continuing basis to keep all the donations under the same preservation/conservation method. Volunteers will be utilized to accomplish this tremendous task.
COMMENTS:
Reviewers will want to know the beginning date of the project, when existing staff will work on it if they are to be involved, when consultants or vendors will employed. None of these issues is addressed. It is fine to make use of volunteers, provided they know what they are doing or are properly supervised, but turning over "this tremendous task" to volunteers does not seem wise. The bigger the project the more likely volunteers are to need close supervision. The second sentence is very unclear and does not seem to relate to the timetable for the project.
GOOD EXAMPLE:
V. PLAN OF WORK
A. The timetable for the project
The project will begin as soon as the technical assistant can be hired. The Library will recruit for this position through the SUNY School of Information and Library Services. We anticipate that the position can be filled within four to six weeks after notice of an award from the Discretionary Grant Program. The technician will work 22.5 hours per week for 30 weeks.
|
Week 01 |
The technical assistant will be trained by the conservator in proper handling techniques, condition evaluation, and simple cleaning procedures. The assistant will also be familiarized with archival inventory procedures by the Archivist. |
|
Weeks 02-21 |
The assistant, under the supervision of the conservator, will clean all items to be boxed (as described below), measure for individual phase boxes, assign inventory numbers, and provide brief contents description. The estimated time per volume for these operations is 1 to 1 1/2 hours.
|
|
Weeks 22-28 |
Inventory numbers will be marked on boxes, and shelving in archives area will be reorganized to accommodate the increase in required space. |
|
Weeks 29-30 |
All items boxed during the project will be reviewed to insure proper labeling and proper fit of boxes. The final report for the project will be prepared. |
GOOD EXAMPLE:
A. The timetable for the project
The first phase of this project has already been completed internally by this institution. During the summer of 1988, a collections management consultant conducted a survey of the Marvin collection to identify its conservation needs. Subsequently, in the fall of 1988, the Society contacted the necessary professionals needed to properly conserve the collection - paper conservator, photograph conservator, microformatting agency, and a professional photographer. Each examined the collection, and from their professional advice, we selected those to help on the proposed project.
The second phase of the project will be the actual implementation of the conservation treatment with announcement of the awarding of the grants in spring of 1989. Since we have all necessary personnel for this project identified, the Society can begin the project in April 1989. In April, we will send the very fragile paper material to the paper conservator and the photographs to the photographer for development of research print copies. At this time, we will also purchase the necessary archival enclosures for the material and properly house them. The paper conservator also recommends making "use" copies of all material. We intend to do so as part of our institutional contribution to the project, reducing handling of originals by researchers. During this second phase, our collection management consultant will also produce photographs of the 76 artifacts in the Ross Marvin Arctic collection at the Society's expense to that they can be added to the total research package to be sent to the microformatter in the third phase. The photographic work on the artifacts and images and the enclosure and use copies of the archival material will be completed by June 1989. The paper conservator will have completed the treatment on the paper items by the end of August.
When the treated documents and copied photographs are all returned, the third phase of the project will begin in September 1989 with the preservation microfilming of the entire collection of 226 items plus photographs of the 76 artifacts. The microformatting is scheduled to be completed by December 1989. Upon completion, a negative copy of the microform will be deposited with the New York State Library. The collection will be properly stored, finding aids will be prepared by the collection management consultant, and the microfilm edition cataloged for inclusion on OCLC. The Society expects to complete the entire project by February 1990. At all stages, the Curator of Collections will act as Project Director and will coordinate the movement of materials from the collection, making all necessary arrangements. He will seek the advice of the collection management consultant as needed as the project progresses.
V. PLAN OF WORK
B. Conservation/preservation activities to be carried out during the project
|
CHECKLIST …4 … Work to be performed …4 … Materials and techniques to be used …4 … Vendor proposals and cost estimates |
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
V. PLAN OF WORK
B. Conservation/preservation activities to be carried out during the project
The vendor has received high recommendations for their craft with paper resources from Another Library and the Local University Library. The vendor will be contracted to provide three sets of microfilms: one for the Library, a second for the aforementioned Local University Library, and the third for storage and OCLC records at the New York State Library. Meanwhile, the scrapbooks will be given spray deacidification and phase storage boxing. Folders will also be deacidified and given regular storage boxing.
When the microfilm and original materials are received, the reels will be stored either in a vertical storage cabinet or on a separate shelf behind the Reference Desk. The archival storage boxes will be housed on the shelves in the Library's basement storage area. The suggested site for storage boxes is more than adequate to protect such archives; the shelves for example, are covered by a huge black tarp designed to shut out room light.
The final step in the Project is indexing the microfilm reels. Using a reader printer, the sequence of articles will be chronicled. From this will arise a comprehensive subject index whose topics will concern the community and the Library. Each heading would be supplemented by an article's title, date and on what reel it may be found. Upon completion, copies of the overall index will be sent to OCLC and the University Library. Time involved: 80 hours.
Summing up, the Project will take an estimated 4 to 5 months, commencing with approval of state funds.
COMMENTS:
This response is a hodge-podge containing information that should be included in the timetable or other sections of the project description. As it is written it provides very sketchy information and is not adequate to give reviewers a clear idea of what activities will take place in what sequence.
Checking a vendors references is a good idea. The first sentence in this response, however, does not tell reviewers very much. Since this is a microfilm project reviewers will be much more concerned to know whether the vendor can produce archival quality master negatives as described in the "Microform Guidelines." A vague statement about "high recommendations for the craft with paper resources" tells reviewers nothing at all. Has the reference institution used the vendor for a microfilm project? Were the results satisfactory, i.e. was the vendor (or the reference) able to verify that the film satisfies published standards for development, resolution, and density?
The "Microform Guidelines Agreement" will provide reviewers with a basic level of assurance on these questions (it must be included), but since the applicants went to the trouble to check references, some additional testimony regarding their experience with preservation microfilming could have been included.
What does "three sets of microfilm" mean? Three user copies? Where does the master negative go? There is no mention of providing proper storage for the master negative. Will there be a printing master, and if so which institution will hold it?
The discussion of methods and techniques raises more questions than it answers. For example, what is the justification for maintaining the scrapbooks in original format after microfilming? Deacidification is not a routine procedure; it is neither appropriate nor necessary for all types of materials. In particular it is seldom (if ever) justifiable for scrapbooks. If and when it is justified, such a procedure would be very complex due to the composite nature of the material, and would require a detailed description of technique. Deacidifying folders (if this means document folders) is never justified--new acid-free folders are called for if the old folders do not meet archival standards.
OCLC is not a place to "send" copies of an index or finding aid. It is a bibliographic network that allows entry of machine readable cataloging information into a national database.
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
B. Conservation/preservation activities to be carried out during the project
Examine documents for their archival preservation needs. We will deacidifiy, rehouse documents, catalog. They should then be ready for future microfilming. After processing, the papers will be sorted, indexed in a notebook and put into marked or numbered boxes.
COMMENTS:
Examination of document "for their archival preservation needs" is an activity that should normally precede the project proposal. If it has not been done how does the applicant know they will deacidify and rehouse the documents? Once again, deacidification is not a routine procedure. What sort of rehousing is planned?
Unless the materials have significant artifactual value (a question not answered here or elsewhere in this application) they should be microfilmed initially. This is by far the most cost effective means of preservation. If they do have some artifactual value and also require physical treatment, both activities might be fundable. In such a case a conservator's treatment proposal should be appended.
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
B. Conservation/preservation activities to be carried out during the project
All photographs will be duplicated both using a video camera and a SLR camera. Negatives will be stored at the center, but copies of photographs will be donated to local libraries and historical societies complete with the documenting information. Newspaper clippings and other similar materials will be copied and transcribed. Both the copies and the transcriptions will also be made available to local libraries.
COMMENTS:
Duplication of photographic images is a fundable activity but transfer onto videotape is not. Videotape has become ubiquitous in recent years and has been put to many innovative uses in all types of cultural institutions. However, as pointed out in the guidelines, videotape is an inherently unstable medium and is not suitable for long-term preservation. Videotape can be expected to last 20-25 years at the most. To transfer deteriorated photographic images to videotape would therefore condemn them to extinction once the originals are gone.
Although laser disk technology holds some promise as an alternative means to preserve photographic images, the only reliable method at present is the photographic reproduction of negatives or prints. This could be accomplished with the SLR (single lens reflex) camera mentioned in this response, but it is by no means a routine procedure. Reviewers would want to know what type of film would be used and how it would be processed. Standards for processing have been estblished by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) which, if carefully followed, can insure that the duplicated images will last indefinitely. There is no mention of materials, techniques, or standards in this response.
As with any photographic reformatting project (including microforms) it is the negative that should be regarded as the archival preservation master. Production of copy prints is an allowable expenditure, but distributing multiple copy prints is not adequate to insure the long-term preservation of the images. To accomplish this the negative must be stored under stable conditions as recommended in the appropriate ANSI standards. There is no indication, either in this response or elsewhere in the application, that the institution can provide such storage. This means that suitable storage should be arranged elsewhere, but reviewers are not told if this is the institution's intention.
"Copying and transcribing" newspaper clippings and other similar materials does not seem an appropriate preservation activity. The application does not describe what these materials are or why they are significant, and this response makes no mention of copying methods. Microform is usually the best way to handle collections of newspaper clippings, but photocopying is sometimes adequate. Preservation photocopying (dry image copies on acid free paper) are sometimes fundable under the Discretionary Grant Program. But reviewers are given no information on how any of this work is to be performed. If they are copied, why do they need to be transcribed? What is the purpose of distributing copies?
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
B. Conservation/preservation activities to be carried out during the project
The survey form will be designed to help the consultant and library staff identify materials of unique research value based on authorship, format, age, and other characteristics. The on-site visits will also be used to verify that those libraries with unique research materials are aware of the resources for developing disaster plans and aware of NYS Discretionary Grants available to institutions as seed money for preservation projects. The information gathered during this project will be used by the Center and by the participating institutions in setting priorities for preservation efforts and for retrospective conversion of the identified unique collections.
COMMENTS:
(This proposal is from a regional organization that provides services to its institutional membership.) Identifying materials of unique research value is not, in itself, a preservation activity and is not fundable through the Discretionary Grant Program. The application does require that applicants establish research value of the materials to be preserved (IV.A and IV.B in the Plan of Work), but this is a prerequisite to submitting the application.
A regional project to assist institutions in assessing the research value of their collections is an excellent idea. Individual Discretionary Grant applicants from this region would be able to make good use of the information gathered in the survey when preparing their applications. As indicated in this response, the information gathered in the survey will be useful in setting preservation priorities. Using on-site visits to advise institutions of disaster preparedness planning resources and the availability of funds through this program also seems like a good idea (although we would hope that regional organizations are already doing this). However, none of this changes the fact that the survey itself is not a fundable preservation activity.
A careful reading of the guidelines should have been sufficient to indicate that this project was not appropriate for this program. If there is any uncertainty at all about whether or not a project is fundable it is wise to make a telephone call and ask--this would have saved this organization a great deal of time and effort.
If the organization needs financial assistance for this project they should try to identify an appropriate funding agency. Regardless of the funding agency, the application would probably be improved by a plan of work that provides a more detailed description of the work to be performed.
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
B. Conservation/preservation activities to be carried out during the project
Due to the fading of the inks and the brittleness of the pages, the materials will have conservation/preservation procedures performed before they are microfilmed. The procedure of aqueous deacidification will be performed on materials where nonsoluble inks are present. Spray deacidification will be used on water soluble inks. Broken leather bindings will be replaced with vegetable tanned English calfskin. For more of these techniques refer to the proposal of the XXX Conservation Lab.
COMMENTS:
There is simply not enough information here. Neither here nor elsewhere in the application is there any discussion of why materials must be both microfilmed and treated. This combination is sometime warranted with materials with great artifactual value in addition to their informational value, but it is never a routine decision.
The conservator reviewing this proposal would immediately note several things (in addition to sketchiness of the response). First, while conservation treatment, particularly deacidification, will help stabilize the items it will not reverse fading of the inks or make the materials less brittle. The argument for doing this before microfilming therefore does not stand up. Second, if the pages are already brittle then rebinding is not an appropriate treatment option--the paper will be too weak. Third, the use of vegetable tanned English (or any other nationality) calfskin is probably not an appropriate binding material even if the volumes are bindable.
While leather is a traditional binding material and has many qualities to recommend it, modern research, as well as casual observation, has proven that it does not hold up. This is due, in part, to the widespread use of central heating which tends to desiccate the leather during the heating season, thus accelerating its deterioration. There are also chemical factors that contribute to the deterioration of leather. These have been the subject of much recent research and a new tanning process has been developed. These leathers, along with alum-tawed skins and vellum, are quite durable and are suitable binding materials, but they are also quite expensive. In conservation binding their use is generally specified for structural rather than aesthetic reasons. This means that their use is appropriate only for certain types of bindings.
This is a lot of technical information for a librarian or an archivist to know. Although applicants are expected to be somewhat conversant with current conservation/preservation standards, reviewers do not expect them to be experts. The authors of this particular application are obviously relying on the information provided by the proposed vendor, and they have attached a detailed treatment proposal from the vendor. This is fine, except that the vendor's proposal has been misrepresented somewhat in the authors' summary, which will not inspire the reviewer's confidence in the institution's ability to decide if the vendor is offering what it needs.
The treatment proposal reads, in part:
Volumes consist of bound blank book volumes with newspaper clipping glued on both sides of each page in "scrapbook" format. Newsprint weakened and embrittled from acid hydrolysis due to the presence of sulphates, groundwood, and lignin from original manufacture. Condition worsened in some cases by the use of acidic (and oxidizing) adhesives to "lay down" the clippings on the original text block. Characterized by discoloration ranging from yellow in mild cases to dark brown in severe cases. While the majority of clippings are legible, it may not be possible to restore to legibility those clippings which are already illegible from severe discoloration. It would appear that many different adhesives were used to construct these records over the course of years, some of which were relatively benign while others were extremely destructive chemically. Clippings to be dismounted where possible, cleaned, deacidified, restored, and remounted on acid-free paper with reversible adhesive in original format. (Those which cannot be dismounted will have to be treated "in situ" on their current support.) Finished sheets to be mylar encapsulated and assembled in Chicago screw post type loose leaf binders. Binders to be full leather with gold tooling and stamping.
Wherever possible, artifacts are to be disbound prior to microfilming in order to film each sheet flat. Generally, microfilming is done prior to treatment. EXCEPTION: Several artifacts, especially those in scrapbook format, are severely discolored and therefore should be treated and cleaned prior to filming in order to obtain the best possible image. The exact procedure should be determined on a case by case basis, depending upon the suitability of each artifact for filming. All filming will be done to the highest archival standards on silver 35mm microfilm. Each film is to be checked for proper density, and editing is to be done immediately after filming to facilitate retakes. Filming is done in duplex format. Master negatives will be turned over to the institution.
The reviewer learns from this treatment report that the materials will be filmed before treatment, not after, as implied in the institution's summary. The one exception is when the items are discolored and require cleaning (not deacidification) in order to be more camera-legible. Reviewers also learn that the materials will be encapsulated and post-bound, again quite a different impression than given in the above response--"broken leather bindings will be replaced with vegetable tanned English calfskin."
In this particular case, even if the institution's summary had adequately represented the vendor's proposal, reviewers would still have several questions. The use of leather and gold tooling for encapsulated post bindings is in no way justified. It is an extravagance entirely inappropriate for these materials. It may be that the vendor is representing the wishes of the institution here, but even so, no reviewer would recommend such a treatment on such flimsy grounds. Reviewers would also wonder at the extraordinary attention given to "restoring" newspaper clippings in a scrapbook. Restoration is not a term usually found in a library or archives conservator's treatment report. It implies a primarily cosmetic concern as opposed to the concern for chemical and structural stability that is more appropriate to conservation treatment of library research materials. With scrapbooks even basic conservation treatment would usually be suspect; restoration is out of the question. Microfilming is the only cost effective means of dealing with these materials. If a "hard copy" is absolutely essential, a preservation photocopy might also be acceptable.
There are vendors who can and will provide whatever services a client requests. There is nothing wrong with this--people get what they are willing to pay for. But it is not an approach suitable to preservation of library research materials. Funds are limited, time is limited, and some techniques just do not help solve the problem. This is why Discretionary Grant applicants are advised to shop around and check a vendor's references, particularly with those who have used the vendor for projects similar to their own. If you aren't an expert in conservation treatments (and we don't expect you to be) then you should at least be a wise consumer--use the same approach you would if making any other major purchase, such as a house or a car.
GOOD EXAMPLE:
V. PLAN OF WORK
B. Conservation/preservation activities to be carried out during the project
The materials to be treated during this project will first be vacuumed using a low suction vacuum and an appropriate filter to remove the surface dirt. This must be done before the inside pages can be treated due to the amount of soiling on the outside of the items. Crevices on the binding will be vacuumed with a mini-vac. Pages will then be cleaned by light brushing. Should excessive soiling remain the pages will be cleaned using a grated Staedtler Mars-plastic eraser.
After cleaning, albums and volumes containing photographs will be interleaved with non-buffered tissue; those not containing photographs will be interleaved with buffered tissue, as required.
Items will then be measured for a commercially produced phase box utilizing the measuring device obtained from the manufacturer. All boxes will be made of lignin-free board. Measurements will be recorded by the technician on the forms supplied by the manufacturer. Detailed specifications on the materials and construction of the phase boxes, and the vendors cost estimate for this particular project are included in the Appendix.
Inventory sheets (sample included in the Appendix) will be completed for each item. For monographs, copies of the appropriate cataloging information will be submitted to the catalog librarian for input into OCLC. A finding aid for the entire collection will be produced by the Archivist.
GOOD EXAMPLE:
B. Conservation/preservation activities to be carried out during the project
When our collection management consultant surveyed the Ross Marvin collection recently, she identified three items that represent conservation priorities: Marvin's personal diary, a Greeley holograph letter that spent 21 years in a rubber matchbox on Ellesmere Island under less-than-archival conditions, and one of the ship's logs with a broken binding. These materials will receive conservation treatment from a professional paper conservator. Deacidification and enclosure are the main treatment methods proposed (please see Item #7-9 in the Appendix for the conservator's proposal on each of the three pieces). The remainder of the paper items in the collection will be stored properly in archival enclosures; and the Society at its own expense will make "use" copies of the material, reducing the handling of originals by researchers.
During the survey, our consultant also identified 10 water-damaged photographs which may need special attention. The Society sent these photographs to a photo conservator recommended by the International Museum of Photography at George Eastman House, Rochester. The conservator inspected the photos and stated that there was no conservation treatment that could be performed on them to improve the images or help in preservation. He suggested we make print copies for researchers' use. Thus, the Society will contract with a professional photographer to make 8" x 10" print "use" copies of the 50 original photographs from the collection, including the 10 water-damaged photographs. These copies will then be available for researchers (please see Item #10 in the Appendix for the photographer's proposal). The originals will be permanently stored in archival enclosures, only to be used when necessary.
While the paper materials are being treated and copies made of the original photographs, the Society will also have its collection management consultant produce photographs of the 76 artifacts from the Ross Marvin Collection, at the Society's expense. They then can be added to the total research package to be sent to the microfilmer in the next stage of the project.
When the treated paper items and all the photographs are completed, the Society will then make arrangements to have the whole Marvin collection sent to a preservation microfilmer. That firm will microformat the entire collection of 226 items plus photographs of the 76 artifacts. This firm follows all ANSI/AIIM, technical standards for preservation microformatting (please see the Microform Guidelines Agreement in the Application Form). The firm will produce a master negative 35mm silver halide microfilm and a positive duplicate of two reels 35mm silver halide microfilm (please see Item #11 in Appendix for microfilming agency's proposal). The master negative microfilm will be deposited with the New York State Library and the Society will retain the printing master and the other duplicate.
GOOD EXAMPLE:
B. Conservation/preservation activities to be carried out during the project
The object of this project will be to develop preliminary plans and cost estimates for a climate control system that will protect the Society's library collections. The plans and estimates will be used to help complete a long range plan for the library in the fall of 1989. A capital campaign will then be launched in November 1989. By November 1990, installation of the climate control system and associated physical improvements will begin.
A heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system (HVAC) that conforms to standard archival practices will be designed. Specifically, the HVAC system will aim to achieve a constant temperature of 68 degrees Fahrenheit (plus or minus 3 degrees), and relative humidity of 50 percent (plus or minus 3 percent). It will also seek to minimize, to the greatest possible degree, the amount of pollution affecting the collections - no more than 10 micrograms per cubic meter of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, and less than two micrograms of ozone.
Associated issues will also have to be addressed in the course of the project. For example, the library windows are over 100 years old, loose fitting, and admit drafts. They will have to be rehabilitated as the HVAC system is installed. Otherwise, pollutants will continue to enter the library and maintaining proper temperatures and humidity will be difficult, if not impossible. The current electrical service is inadequate to power a substantial HVAC system. Calculations for providing new service will have to be developed.
Retrofitting an old building with an HVAC system is always a complicated task. In this case it will be made even more difficult because the Society's 1880 library is one of only two designated interior landmarks in all of Brooklyn. That means that the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission will have to review and approve any proposed plans for installing an HVAC system. Particular sensitivity will be needed in routing ducts and placing supply and return air vents in the library without disturbing protected moldings, woodwork, and other special features. In addition, the Landmarks Commission will be involved in deciding where condensing units can be placed on the outside of the building since the exterior of the Society's structure is also a designated landmark. All of these procedures will make this study far more costly than a similar study for a newer building without landmark restrictions.
V. PLAN OF WORK
C. Personnel and vendors involved in the project
|
CHECKLIST …4 … Project manager …4 … Personnel to be hired …4 … Existing staff to be used …4 … Consultants …4 … Vendors …4 … Qualifications.. |
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
V. PLAN OF WORK
C. Personnel and vendors involved in the project
Personnel involved will be students from the University; one or two people will be sent at a time. They will be paid. We will also be consulting with the curator from the Historical Society. She will be coming when we call her, and will not be there all of the time. She will be paid, but because we do not know exactly how many hours she will be putting in we cannot determine her wages at this time. Six people of our Society will be volunteers for the project also. The Society Historian, will be responsible for overall project management, at no expense.
COMMENTS:
Reviewers are not told what the consultant will do, whether or not there will be a report, or what her qualifications are. Using students from the university is fine, but reviewers will not know from this response (or anywhere else in this application) what the students will do--there are no job descriptions or lists of duties. Who will train and supervise them? How many will be hired?
By saying the consultant "will be coming when we call her," reviewers are likely to assume that little formal planning has gone on, and that the institution plans to "wing it," calling on the consultant when the notion strikes.
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
C. Personnel and vendors involved in the project
We plan to hire a person who is very knowledgeable in cataloguing and well-versed in local history to oversee the project. Her assistant will be a former employee of the Library who has devoted much of her spare time to updating the collection over the past years with newsworthy items and memorabilia. There will be no vendors involved in the project. The town Historian and Director of the Historical Society are available to us on a consultant basis with no charge.
COMMENTS:
The guidelines clearly state that the project manager should normally be a member of the institution's permanent staff who is closely involved with the project. If this is not possible for this institution reviewers should be given an explanation. In any case reviewers are not told who the applicant intends to hire. Since they refer to this person as "her" it seems they may already have someone in mind. Even if she is indeed "a person very knowledgeable in cataloging and well versed in local history," reviewers are still given no information on her qualifications to perform the work of this project--no resume is attached, nor is a job description or list of duties provided. (Although reviewers will have noted this earlier in the application, cataloging is not usually an eligible activity.)
The same applies for the assistant. We are not told who she is or what her qualifications are. Past volunteer work is admirable but does not imply that a person is qualified to handle specific preservation activities.
The town historian and director of the historical society are no doubt valuable assets to a local history project at a public library, and it is fine that they are willing to donate their services, but reviewers are not told what it is they will consult about.
In short, reviewers look to this section to find out who will do what during the project, and to determine if these persons are qualified to do it. This response does not answer any of these questions.
GOOD EXAMPLE:
V. PLAN OF WORK
C. Personnel involved in the project
Staff contributing to this project include the Head Librarian, the Paper Conservator, the Librarian, and the Archivist. The Librarian will be responsible for the overall management of the project. In addition, the Museum proposes to hire a technical assistant who will work part-time for the duration of the project (a complete job description is included in the Appendix.)
The Head Librarian has eleven years experience working with researchers in the library. Her primary professional concerns for the library collection include collection development combined with efficient retrieval of resources. She is also responsible for developing an archival program within the Institution. As project manager the Head Librarian will contribute six weeks to the project.
The Paper Conservator will contribute three weeks to the project in training the technical assistant, consulting during the project, and on project review. She will be responsible for purchasing the phase boxes and reviewing the work of the technical assistant. The conservator is a graduate of the Conservation of Library and Archival Materials Program at Columbia University, New York. The attached resume outlines other relevant work experience.
The Archivist will be responsible for writing the finding aid for the collection and conducting further research into the history of the Company (whose archives are being preserved), and for identifying possible sources for related materials. She will contribute 10 weeks to the project.
GOOD EXAMPLE:
C. Personnel and vendors involved in the project
General supervision of the project will be the responsibility of XXXX, Curator of Collections at the Historical Society. Mr. XXXX has been curator for 2 1/2 years with previous training and six years experience in museum curatorial responsibilities. As Curator of Collections, he is in charge of the management of the archival, library, and museum collections, and is familiar with the Marvin collection. He has also acted as project director for the IMS Conservation Survey project (1988-89). His time on this project will be paid from the Society's operating budget.
Four vendors will be used in this conservation project. The initial survey was performed by XXXX, an experienced collection management consultant (see attached resume). This consultant will also carry out the archival-enclosure phase of the project, the photographing of the 76 artifacts to be included in the microfilming, and the production of the finding aid. Through NYSCA-funding, Dr. XXXX has worked with our Society for the past year as a collection management consultant. She has advised us in the development and implementation of our collection management computerization and reviewed inputs, and has worked on our deaccessioning program. She is familiar with our collections as she has been contracted for 25 days in 1988.
XXXX, of Art Conservation, Inc. will perform treatments on the diary, letter, and logbook described in the attached treatments proposals. Mr. XXXX is a 1983 graduate of the Cooperstown Graduate Program in the Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. He has had several years of training and, since 1983, has operated his own business (see attached resume). Since 1986, Mr. XXXX has treated 10 paper items from our collection. In 1988, he surveyed our whole paper collection for the IMS Conservation Survey Project.
The Society will use professional photographer, XXXX of Corning, NY, to produce print use copies of the 50 original photographs in the collection. Mr. XXXX was photographer at the XXX Museum for several years, and has operated his own photography firm (see attached resume). Since 1985, he has provided photographic services to our Society. On a regular basis, he makes print copies of photographs for researchers' requests. He has also done copy work for several of our exhibits and publications.
Archival Services, Inc. has submitted a competitive bid for the preservation microfilming of the Marvin collection materials. Archival Services has performed similar preservation microfilming projects for various institutions, including the Whitney Museum of American Art, the Watson Library of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, Herbert H. Lehman College Library, Bronx, NY, and the Leo Baeck Institute, New York, NY. Resume of key personnel and bid are attached.
GOOD EXAMPLE:
C. Personnel and vendors involved in the project
Dr. XXXX, the Society's Head Librarian, will have the day-to-day responsibility for overseeing the project. She holds a Ph.D. in American History and an M.A. in Library Science from Columbia University (see attached resume). In addition to her responsibility for managing the overall project she will assemble the materials needed for the required architect's review.
Dr. XXXX will report to XXXX, the Society's Executive Director, who oversees all special projects initiated by the Society. Mr. XXXX has been with the Society five years and has an M.A. in Art History from Columbia University (see attached resume).
The preliminary plans and cost estimates for the climate control system will be produced by the architects, XXXX and Associates. XXXX and Associates specialize in projects involving historic structures. They recently supervised the renovation of the Society's ground floor exhibit galleries, a project that involved the installation of a state-of-the-art HVAC system. Thus, the firm has already had extensive experience working in the Society's building. The firm is also familiar with the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission and will be able to work with the Commission in designing a suitable plan for installing the HVAC system. XXXX, senior Associate of the firm, will be in charge of the project.
Working under the direction of XXXX and Associates will be XXXX, mechanical/electrical consulting engineers. The firm recently designed the HVAC system for the Society's renovated exhibit gallery. It has also designed HVAC systems for the New York Public Library, Clark University Library, the Orlando (Florida) Public Library, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and many other distinguished clients.
Also assisting XXXX and Associates will be XXXX Associates, structural engineers. XXXX will lend advise on how the routing of duct work will affect the building's structural stability, as well as where to place the compressors and condensers. Mr. XXXX has also previously worked on projects within the Society's building.
Vendors letters of agreement, company profiles, and pertinent resumes are included in the appendix.
V. PLAN OF WORK
D. Environmental conditions in which preserved materials will be stored
|
CHECKLIST …4 … Extent of existing controls …4 … Possibility or plans for improvement |
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
V. PLAN OF WORK
D. Environmental conditions in which preserved materials will be stored
The whole collection will be stored in acid-free boxes in a light controlled, fire proof, secure room.
COMMENTS:
This response provides no information about the level of temperature and humidity controls available, and only makes a generalization about light levels.
While reviewers realize that complete environmental controls are beyond the means of most institutions, they do want to know if reasonable precautions have been taken to minimize damage that can result from temperature and relative humidity fluctuations.
In this response it is notable that the collection has been rehoused since protective enclosures can to some degree "buffer" the materials from environmental changes. If, however, there is no way to control temperature in the storage area (if the thermostat is located in another room, for example) this slight advantage will be lost.
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
D. Environmental conditions in which preserved materials will be stored
Our local history collection will be stored in large bookcases in a one room schoolhouse which has recently been restored. Although the building originally was furnished only with a fireplace, we supply several portable heaters (for those cold days) and a window air conditioner (in the summer) for heating and cooling. While the heaters and air conditioner are mainly for the comfort of our visitors (our very well-attended children's educational programs include "Growing up in the Past--a Day in the 19th Century Classroom"), they provide protection for the collection as well.
COMMENTS:
Window air conditioners do, indeed, provide some welcome relief from the summer heat, but when it comes to the preservation of library materials they are not at all helpful. While lowering the temperature they will also increase the humidity significantly--this is not a malfunction, but a result of how the machine works. While lower temperatures are better for long-term storage of library and archival materials, unless they are maintained in conjunction with some control over humidity there is no advantage in terms of preservation. This is especially true since the unit is almost certainly turned off at night, setting up a very destructive cycle of high and low temperatures. Cycling of room temperature has been demonstrated to considerably accelerate the rate of deterioration.
Space heaters (and most other forms of heating) tend to dry out the air, often reducing relative humidity (RH) to 5-10 percent. Since the recommended levels of RH for storage of paper-based library materials is 50 percent, space heating can cause severe desiccation. This one room school house seems to be heavily trafficked during at least part of the year. The frequent opening and closing of doors would not help stabilize conditions either.
Storing materials in historic buildings is always difficult. It is not always possible to retrofit such buildings with adequate environmental control systems, and even if it can be done there is some danger that good, stable conditions for books, paintings, etc. may be damaging to the structure of the building. Rather than using stopgap measures (like window air conditioners and space heaters) or even purchasing an "off-the-shelf" integrated system, institutions housing their collections in historic buildings should work with a qualified consultant to evaluate needs and determine a reasonable course of action. It may be possible to make some sort of accommodation for the collections, but it may also require more drastic measures, such as moving the collections.
While reviewers understand that not every institution can provide optimum environmental conditions for collections, they will nevertheless expect that applicants will have given the matter serious and professional attention, or will do so during the course of the project. Stopgap measures do not make a favorable impression since they usually do more harm than good.
GOOD EXAMPLE:
V. PLAN OF WORK
D. Environmental conditions in which preserved materials will be stored
The Library does not have a climate-control environment. Light levels in the general stacks are kept low and ultraviolet filters have been installed on the windows. Since the building was constructed in 1930 there is little possibility of obtaining a high level of mechanical control over temperature and humidity. However, since the walls are relatively thick and quite solid our monitoring equipment indicates that the building tends to retain both heat and cold. Therefore, changes occur slowly, minimizing the possibility of damage, thermostats in the Library are set no higher than 68 degrees during the heating season.
The manuscripts to be preserved during this project are stored in the Library's vault, where light levels are at a minimum, and there is no radiator. Our monitoring has shown that this is the most stable area in the building (a summary of monthly hygrothermograph readings for the past year is included in the Appendix).
GOOD EXAMPLE:
D. Environmental conditions in which preserved materials will be stored
When the Marvin collection is returned after microfilming, the materials, housed in their new archival enclosures, will be placed in storage in the Society's climate-controlled curatorial areas. General environmental conditions of these storage areas have been described above. The original framed documents and photographs, artifacts, drawings, lithographs, diaries and logbooks will all be placed in the humidity-and temperature-controlled collection storage. The microfilm of the entire collection, pamphlets, and original unframed documents and photographs and their copies will be housed in the environmentally-controlled library/archives. With our IMS Conservation Survey grant we will be purchasing hygrothermographs in 1989 so we can better monitor environmental conditions in these areas. Also, in his paper collection survey for the IMS grant, the paper conservator pinpointed what control measures are further required in these areas.
GOOD EXAMPLE:
D. Environmental conditions in which preserved materials will be stored
The Rare Book Room is temperature and humidity controlled 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Conditions are kept at or near 65 degrees F and 50 percent relative humidity. The book cases themselves, being enclosed, serve as an additional environmental buffer. The room is kept dark except when it is in use, and all of the fluorescent lighting is UV filtered. A regular program of monitoring is carried out in the Room (see appendix for a summary of temperature and humidity readings for the past year).
V. PLAN OF WORK
E. Preparations for disaster
|
CHECKLIST …4 … Written disaster plan? …4 … Available resources |
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
V. PLAN OF WORK
E. Preparations for disasters
Emergency procedures for the archives follow security policies. In the event of an emergency, and following action if necessary to remedy the problem, the campus safety department contracts the college administrator who would then contact the project manager. In a less serious situation, the project manager would be able to consult with the appropriate academic office to work out a solution to the problem.
COMMENTS:
It is clear from this response that the institution does not have a written disaster plan. It also seems that it does not know what a disaster preparedness plan is. Since the New York State Conservation/Preservation Program has been actively promoting disaster planning in recent years, and since the guidelines and instructions briefly describe what a plan is and indicates that a resource packet is available, there is really no excuse for this institution not being better informed.
The "procedures" alluded to are very unclear. Reviewers will get the impression that the project manager thinks that he does not need to know the specific procedures so long as he can call the "appropriate academic office." It may be that the applicant has mistaken "people emergency" procedures for a disaster preparedness plan for library or archival materials. An emergency plan is certainly necessary, and the project manager still needs to know more about emergency procedures, but an emergency plan is no substitute for a disaster preparedness plan when the basement stacks are flooded!
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
E. Preparations for disasters
The best we can provide now is to continue to store articles in the fireproof room. We look forward to microfilming preserved documents and placing them in metal storage cabinets. We would also be willing to donate copies of microfilm to the State Computer System. Then we would not have to rely on our own copies. Should they become destroyed for some unknown reason, then there will be other copies.
COMMENTS:
A fireproof room does not equal a disaster plan. Reviewers will ask a number of questions: Does the institution have a plan? If not how will applicants respond to a disaster affecting library, archival or record resources? What resources are available locally? Do they know where to go for additional assistance? Does the staff know what to do when they discover damaged materials? Have preventive measures been taken?
While microfilming is a significant preservation measure, it is not synonymous with preparation for disaster. Depositing storage copies of film elsewhere, in this case the so called "State Computer System," will certainly preserve a copy of the film if the project library is destroyed, but this will not help in dealing with the materials damaged by the fire, flood, or whatever.
(NOTE: Apparently the "State Computer System" means OCLC, the bibliographic network to which the New York State Library belongs. This sort of error does not inspire the reviewers' confidence.)
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
E. Preparations for disasters
It is our intent to deposit the master negatives of our directories at the New York State Library, as the most feasible and economical means of protection against their destruction by disaster.
COMMENTS:
The purpose of depositing microfilm copies at NYSL is to enhance bibliographic control since the Library will catalog the film on OCLC. In addition the State Library can provide stable environmental conditions for long-term storage, but this in no way satisfies the need for a disaster preparedness plan.
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
E. Preparations for disasters
Having two copies of the master films stored separately in secure depository locations is the basic preparation made for disaster. A written plan hasn't been made for a project of this nature.
COMMENTS:
They seem to have completely misunderstood the nature and purpose of a disaster preparedness plan. Storing the master negative (there is only one master, by the way) off-site is obviously a good precaution (although its primary purpose is usually to provide stable environmental conditions). But this does not mean, as suggested here, that a disaster plan is not needed. In addition to the public service copies of microfilm, which would be cheaper to save than to reproduce in many cases, the library obviously has other materials that could be damaged by a disaster.
The purpose of this section of the Plan of Work is not to write a disaster plan for this particular project, but to indicate that the institution has begun to take some very basic steps towards the long-term care and preservation of its collections. This includes the materials to be preserved with grant funds, but the institution's other library and archival collections as well.
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
E. Preparations for disasters
The Town is fortunate that they do not have any problems from flooding, hurricanes, tornadoes, etc. Our biggest problem would be fire or a loss of heat for an extended period of time. The building housing the collection is brick and contains smoke detectors and fire extinguishers. A fire extinguisher will be placed in the collections room. The local fire department is located two blocks away and is an excellent department. The department will be briefed on the collection's value and care to be taken in case of fire resulting in water damage. Niagara Mohawk provides electrical service to this area and in the past 25 years I have never seen the electrical service out for more than six or seven hours.
COMMENTS:
Saying that the town is fortunate in not having problems with natural disasters is probably a sure way to bring one on! This is certainly not a reason to go without a disaster preparedness plan. Most damage to library collections comes from less catastrophic incidents, such as faulty plumbing, backed-up sewers, leaky roofs, etc. The fire prevention mentioned seems good, especially the plans to brief the fire department on the importance of the collections. Fire departments are always very helpful when asked to assist in prevention measures, and will be glad for an opportunity to develop a special fire fighting plan for any building. However, since it takes water to extinguish a burning building there will inevitably be some water damage to library materials. What does this institution plan to do then? A written disaster plan describing procedures for salvage of water damaged materials and a list of resources--supplies, facilities, other people to help out, etc.--is a necessity if damage and loss are to be limited.
GOOD EXAMPLE:
V. PLAN OF WORK
E. Preparations for disasters
The Library does not have a disaster plan at present. We plan to take advantage of the upcoming Disaster Preparedness Workshop sponsored by the New York State Library to begin developing a plan. In addition, the METRO 3R"s Council is preparing a list of local resources which will be available free to its members (this list is now complete) which will assist us in developing a plan tailored to our institution.
There has been one occasion in the recent past where we encountered a water emergency. In that case, we moved the threatened materials, stopped the water flow, and telephoned a regional conservation center. The staff there was very helpful, giving us specific instructions, which we followed, on what to do with the water-damaged materials. Should we encounter another emergency prior to completing our plan similar actions would be taken.
GOOD EXAMPLE:
E. Preparations for disasters
A written disaster preparedness plan was prepared in 1980 and is now being revised and updated by the Conservation Manager. Disaster supplies are maintained in readiness, and proved useful during a recent water leak in the main stacks. In addition, building maintenance personnel have been made aware of the Library's special needs in the event of a disaster, and regularly check for leakage or dangerous conditions, especially during periods when the library is not open. They are trained in initial disaster response and know where emergency supplies are stored.
In dealing with a recent leak affecting a small number of books, we were able to treat most of the items on site and to minimize any damage. We set up an emergency drying area in the Reference Reading Room, interleaved books or journals printed on coated paper, stored several very wet items in a freezer at the nearby museum, and eventually sent a small number to a commercial salvage firm for freeze-drying. An updated list of local and statewide resource people is available with each copy of the disaster plan, which is prominently displayed at key work stations in the Library.
GOOD EXAMPLE:
E. Preparations for disaster
The Society formulated a comprehensive Disaster Plan in 1984, a copy of which is included in the Appendix. (please see Item #12). The plan is reviewed annually and a "refresher course" is held for key staff on the recovery team.
V. PLAN OF WORK
F. Security arrangements for protecting the collections
|
CHECKLIST …4 … Theft …4 … Mutilation …4 … Inappropriate use |
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
V. PLAN OF WORK
F. Security arrangements for protecting the collection
There is limited access to the town hall and storage room. Permission and access must be obtained by the President of the Society or the Historian. We try to answer all requests if it is possible. We try to research information ourselves and respond with photocopies.
COMMENTS:
It sounds as if the possibility of theft may be limited by restricted access, which is good. But the conditions under which users have access to the materials is not clear. Are materials used in a supervised or unsupervised area? Are there instructions for proper use procedures (clearly stating rules about not using ballpoint pens or other ink markers at tables where research materials are in use, for example)? Is a staff member available to assist/instruct patrons in dealing with brittle materials?
Improper use of materials is often a greater danger than either theft or mutilation. Supervision of the area where materials are used can reduce the incidence of all three.
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
F. Security arrangements for protecting the collections
In a small library like ours, security is not a major concern. Research staff have full access to the collection at all times and visitors are well supervised. Our losses are minimal.
COMMENTS:
A collection doesn't have to be stolen in the night for security to be a concern. It is always a concern if one has materials that are difficult or expensive to replace. Even with the widespread use of photocopy machines in libraries and archives, mutilation of journals is a serious problem everywhere. Illustrated materials--art and architecture books, travel magazines, scientific publications with diagrams and charts, photographic collections--are particularly susceptible to mutilation or theft, but nothing is immune.
Certainly in a collection with open stacks, as described here, it is not possible to supervise visitors at all times. The fact that applicants acknowledge "minimal losses" indicates that even the best supervision of visitors sometimes fails. If it does not need to worry about security this institution is indeed lucky--or maybe applicants are just unaware that there is a problem. Is any loss acceptable? If so, how much loss does it take for security to be a concern?
GOOD EXAMPLE:
V. PLAN OF WORK
F. Security arrangements for protecting the collections
An electromagnetic security system was installed in November of 1986. Security has improved significantly since that time: inventory statistics compiled in June of 1987 indicated that losses had decreased by exactly half in the last year.
Additional alarms have been installed on the doors to the Rare Book Room and the
Archives to prevent unauthorized entry. This past September we instituted a "Rare Book Request Form," to keep better track of materials which are requested from the special collections. This system will also provide further statistics on use of the collection. All materials will continue to be used only in the supervised reading room designated for these two collections.
GOOD EXAMPLE:
F. Security arrangements for protecting collections
The Rare Book Room is a separate, nonpublic area of the Library, equipped with a burglar alarm and requiring keys (which are kept in the Librarian's office) for entrance. Each of the rare book cases has its own lock as well. During the hours when the Museum is closed, the entire building is constantly patrolled by a guard force. Researchers using rare books generally have the items brought to them to use in the Library's main reading room. Individuals who wish to do extensive research may arrange for use of the Rare Book Room through the Library's reference staff. No costs, briefcases, pens, scissors, etc., are permitted in the Rare Book Room. Researchers and staff must use pencils only. No food, beverages, or smoking are permitted.
GOOD EXAMPLE:
F. Security arrangements for protecting the collections
The Society's entire facility is protected by a 24-hour fire/intrusion detection system tied directly to the police and fire departments. All collections are stored on the second floor, a significant precaution in flood-prone Elmira. Several actions have been taken to make our library/archives more secure. In 1986, the Society reorganized the library/archives to segregate researchers from the collection. Research use of all material is supervised, and all patrons are required to sign our register. Also, the New York State vandalism law on library materials is prominently posted in our research room.
| Previous Section | Next Section |
Last modified on January 20, 2000/djr
For questions or comments contact Barbara Lilley
URL: http://www.nysl.nysed.gov/libdev/cp/workplan.htm