| New York State Library | Division of Library Development |
II. INSTITUTIONAL COMMITMENT TO CONSERVATION/PRESERVATION
|
CHECKLIST …4 … Current and long-range preservation plans …4 … Surveys? …4 … Institutional funding for preservation …4 … Other sources of funding |
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
II. INSTITUTIONAL COMMITMENT TO CONSERVATION/PRESERVATION
The day of the discovery of the old records, they were moved inside to the town hall. They were stored for years in an unsafe area with variating temperatures. The town hall provides a stable environment with controlled temperatures and lighting. The area of storage now is also secure. Shortly after, the President of the historical society consulted with an advisor from the Local Historical Service Agency. She also attended preservation workshops. She came back and showed several volunteers from our organization the preservation process. The documents completed have been inspected, unwrapped from bundles, unfolded properly, rehoused into acid free bags, individually, placed into acid free boxes and indexed.
COMMENTS:
This response alludes to a number of key points but provides very little information. Where, for instance, did the records come from? Town halls would not normally be expected to have appropriate environmental controls for archival record storage--has some work been done to provide for appropriate storage? If so, what conditions are maintained?
If the agency has invested in environmental controls for a records storage facility this would be a significant conservation/preservation activity (and an expensive one) which the application should point out. Neither the response here nor the discussion of environmental conditions in the storage area under "Plan of Work" provides any specific information.
Still other questions are raised by this response: What did the advisor advise? Was this a formal consultation (and if so was there a report), or an informal request for assistance? In either case, were any actions taken as a result?
The activities mentioned--workshop, rehousing, etc.--do not give a clear picture of what preservation activities actually go on, and there is no information to indicate if and how these activities fit into any current or long-range plans, or whether such plans exist.
Unlike acid-free folders, "acid-free bags" are not a standard protective enclosure (none of the reviewers had even heard of them), so neither their use nor their function should be taken for granted. Are these a local innovation? If so, how are they used? Does one size fit all (which sounds like a bad idea for these types of materials)? Are they sealed? Where do they come from?
There must be some funds available for conservation/preservation (for boxes, folders, "bags," etc.), but how much? What is the source of funding--the institutional budget, a grant, a gift?
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
Preservation of the collection represents a new venture for the Library. It is unusual for a community library to have an historical collection of major importance to maintain. However, we have a deep commitment to this special project because of its tremendous value to the people and town we serve. The Library has a special local history room. The shelving and some equipment are in place, including and Apple IIe microcomputer to assist in indexing and other collection management functions.
A survey of the Collection was made in September 1988 (Appendix D.)
The survey describes both its content and condition of the collection. The fee for the survey was paid by the Library. Institutional funding in the form of staff time will be used during the funding period. In addition, some institutional funding would be available for critical preservation work.
COMMENTS:
This response provided some information for reviewers, but not enough. No mention is made of current or long-range preservation planning. Even though the Library is just beginning its preservation efforts, this does not mean that there is no need for planning. A reviewer might expect from what is written here that the survey gave the library the basic information it needs to begin developing a preservation plan. However, a look at Appendix I indicated that the survey was an assessment of the historical significance of the collection, not a preservation survey. While this type of assessment is important and provides valuable background for preservation planning, it would not normally be expected to provide specific information of use in developing a long-range preservation plan.
Other than saying that institutional funding will be used for "critical" preservation work--although we are not told what, exactly, this is--there is no indication of how much funding the institution actually provides for preservation. There is no mention of priorities, and no description of any preservation activities that might be going on already. ("Indexing and other collection management functions" are not preservation activities per se.)
Although it is not relevant in this response, it is not really true that "it is unusual for a community library to have an historical collection of major importance to maintain". Many do have such collections. Statements like this do not inspire confidence in the institution's ability to accurately assess its needs.
GOOD EXAMPLE:
II. INSTITUTIONAL COMMITMENT TO CONSERVATION/PRESERVATION
The Library's mission statement says that the preservation of the historic collection is one of the institutions most important goals. In addition to its ongoing program of microfilming and phase boxing, a public relations campaign will be carried out in 1989 to inform users of the historic value of the collection and to make them aware of the preservation problems associated with documentary materials. Several bookmark-format handouts describing the Library's preservation activities will be prepared and distributed to all users, and two public programs on preservation topics are being planned.
The library has funded three surveys to assist with the development of its long-range plan for preservation. The first, a field survey by the regional conservation center, assessed our environmental conditions. The Library has already implemented many of the recommendations. The Library staff also made sure that the center's recommendations were available to the Board of Trustees during its discussions of the renovation plan currently being discussed with an architectural and engineering consultant.
The other two surveys were conducted by a curator from the State Archives and a conservator in private practice. Conducted at the same time, these two surveys identified bibliographically and historically significant collections in the Library's archives, identified specific preservation problems, and outlined a number of possible treatment options. These surveys have been used to set treatment priorities for the collections.
The Library has a regular line item in the operating budget for preservation activities. This includes the purchase of appropriate supplies, and funds for the rebinding and phase boxing of targeted items. The amount included in the 1988 budget (exclusive of grant or gift funds) is $2,000, approximately three percent of the Library's materials budget. In the previous year an additional $1,000 was raised by the Library's volunteers for a scrapbook microfilming project.
GOOD EXAMPLE:
All collections are handled in accordance with professional principles of conservation and with the agency's own Collections Management Policy. Air conditioning and humidity controls were added in 1988 with New York State Council on the Arts (NYSCA) funding. Currently, a subsequent grant application has been sent to NYSCA for air conditioning and humidity controls in our exhibit gallery. All windows in collections areas and the exhibit gallery are covered with closed venetian blinds, and rooms are illuminated by UV-shielded fluorescent fixtures and high-pressure sodium lamps. Archival quality materials are used for enclosure and storage of collections. In 1988, we completed and in-house project of producing research-use copies of the photographic collection. In 1989, we expect to use our Memorial Fund for conservation of two 1852 Elmira maps.
The majority of the Society's conservation surveys and treatments on materials have been funded by outside sources. Our past history of receiving NYSCA conservation grants began in 1983. Since then, the Society has received NYSCA funding almost every year for professional conservator's fees, including paper conservator, XXXX; photograph conservator, XXXX; anthropological conservator, XXXX; the Regional Conservation Center; the Regional Art in 1987 allowed conservation of a photograph, several works of art on paper, and historic document, and four maps. Of the items conserved by NYSCA funding over the past five years, were two objects from the Ross Marvin collection which relate directly to his grant proposal - a letter from Robert Peary and Marvin's fur parka. With a grant of $7,000 from the local Cooper Foundation, the Society began in 1987 to microformat the heavily-used obituary files, 265 indexed scrapbooks, 10 19th century city directories, and 7 local atlases. In 1988, the Society was awarded $4,478 by the Institute of Museum Services (IMS) Conservation Survey grant to conduct a general survey by paper, objects, and textile conservators. The information gained will be used in 1989 to develop a long-range plan for conservation and a priority list of items needing conservation treatment. Funds from the IMS grant will also be utilized to purchase hygrothermographs so that we can better monitor our environmental conditions in storage and exhibit areas.
II. INSTITUTIONAL COMMMITMENT TO CONSERVATION/PRESERVATION
|
CHECKLIST …4 … Cooperative projects …4 … Shared cons/pres staff or facilities …4 … Bibliographic databases …4 … Participation in regional preservation activities |
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
II. INSTITUTIONAL COMMITMENT TO CONSERVATION/PRESERVATION
Does not apply
COMMENTS:
Why doesn't it apply. Even if the institution does not participate at all in regional activities the question still applies. Are the applicants at least aware that cooperative and regional activities are under way in their area? If so, is there a legitimate reason why they have not looked there for help?
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
B. Participation in cooperative or regional conservation/preservation activities
Our institution has not yet participated with any other organization in conservation/preservation activities. Our organization is four-years old and this is our first attempt at a preservation project. At this time it would not be feasible for us to work with another organization as there is no one close enough who is interested in this project. We are constantly seeking out information from neighboring historical groups as to the nature of their activities. I am sure that if we ever come across someone who is interested in the same kind of preservation project that we are, we will surely look into cooperative activities.
COMMENTS:
It is okay to be new to conservation/preservation. However, this applicant seems to have misunderstood what cooperative activities are and what they can accomplish.
Cooperative activities are not confined to "interest in this project," (even if this were a coop project). Cooperative activities include things like sharing conservation/preservation staff or facilities, contributing records to a bibliographic database, or reporting information to the National Union Catalog (NUC). Membership in a regional organization involved with conservation/preservation is also a cooperative activity, so is attending workshops sponsored by such organizations (library systems, regional historical service agencies, New York Library Association (NYLA), American Library Association (ALA), American Institute for Conservation (AIC), Society of American Archivists (SAA), etc.); see "Sources of Advice and Assistance" in the guidelines.
Even if an organization is new to conservation/preservation--especially if it is new--cooperative activities are a good way to take advantage of other people's experience and expertise. They can save you time and money, and help insure that your planning is adequate for your preservation needs.
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
B. Participation in cooperative or regional conservation/preservation activities
A negative copy of the master microfilms resulting from the microfilming project will be deposited at the New York State Library and records will be entered in the NUC and OCLC, as well as locally with the Public Library System and the Library Resources Council.
COMMENTS:
Depositing master microforms at the State Library is an option available to all Discretionary Grant award recipients. Since the library will enter appropriate records on OCLC, a national online database, there is a cooperative aspect to this. However, there is a lot more to be gained from cooperative and regional activities, and there is a lot more going on in this particular region that the institution could take advantage of. Since the applicants mention the Public Library System and Library Resources Council, they should already be aware of some of these activities and may already be involved in some of them. But, unless they tell the reviewers, it will be assumed that the applicant has overlooked a major source of assistance in its preservation efforts.
NOT-SO-GOOD EXAMPLE:
B. Participation in cooperative or regional conservation/preservation activities
The Historical Society has on several occasions, helped other centers in the area by providing them with programs and materials which show the unbreakable chain linking the cultural and natural worlds. By demonstrating fading skills such as woodcarving, natural dying, storytelling and the use of medicinal plants, the center hopes to promote public awareness and interest in these skills. We feel it is not possible to teach about either natural or cultural history without discussing the other.
COMMENTS:
Everything this says is fine, but it has nothing to do with cooperative conservation/preservation activities. Preservation of "fading skills" is admirable, but it does not qualify as preservation of library research materials. If preservation of "fading skills" is the intent of this project (we find out later that it is) the author should have read the guidelines more closely to find out if such a project is eligible--it isn't. See also "Some Hints on Basic Grant Writing," sections III.B and IV.
GOOD EXAMPLE:
II. INSTITUTIONAL COMMITMENT TO CONSERVATION/PRESERVATION
B. Participation in cooperative or regional conservation/preservation activities
Since 1966 a cooperative agreement between the Public Library and Syracuse University has placed the Smith Collection a rare book collection on the history of books and printing, in the care of the Arents Research Library, where environmental protection, lacking in the Library's Carnegie building, is available. Upon receipt, university staff treated, repaired and provided appropriate protective wrapping for individual items and presently administer access to the collection by the approved researchers. The Collection will move back to the Public Library with the opening of our new facility in 1988.
Since the inception of the Central New York Library Resources Council's (CENTRO) Preservation Committee, a Library professional staff member has served on the Committee. In addition to planning CENTRO-sponsored training workshops the group has surveyed CENTRO members about preservation needs, prepared information on basic preservation kits of value to libraries for all sizes and sought support for disaster planning assistance for all CENTRO libraries.
The CENTRO Committee is organizing a core collection of materials related to conservation/preservation, including nonprint media, and the Library's collection development office is supplementing these resources through purchase of items that do not duplicate, but rather broaden the range of information available locally on relevant topics.
The Library time-shares an OCLC terminal with the University to allow online cataloging of the collection.
GOOD EXAMPLE:
B. Participation in cooperative or regional conservation/preservation activities
The Society participates in conservation planning with MECA (Museums of the Elmira-Corning Area), the Regional Council of Historical Agencies, the Federation of Historical Services, and the Western New York Association of Historical Agencies, including sending staff to conservation workshops and meetings. We are members of the American Association for State and Local History and the American Association of Museums, by whom we are accredited. The Society has worked on conservation surveys and individual treatment with several regional conservation centers - The Conservation Workshop, the Regional Conservation Center; and the Regional Art Conservation Laboratory.
| Previous Section | Next Section |
Last modified on January 19, 2000/djr
For questions or comments contact Barbara Lilley
URL: http://www.nysl.nysed.gov/libdev/cp/cpinscom.htm